2/1/2024 I can define, discuss, and provide current examples of armed conflicts, war, and terrorismRead Now![]() ![]() discussion of IHL governing international armed conflicts and to conclude. It concludes that the debate has greatly enriched the overall argument. textbook, in an attempt to take stock of and provide answers to recent devel. ![]() We always can end a conflict when we want by surrender. It argues that the obsession with the ‘newness’ of wars misses the point about the logic of new wars that there is a blurring of war and crime but it is important to address the political elements of new wars that, although the data should be used with caution, it does seem to offer support for some elements of the new war thesis and that the argument is indeed post-Clausewitzean because new wars are not ‘contests of wills’ but more similar to a mutual enterprise. For example, war against Hitlers Germany from 1939 to 1945 cost millions lives, but it prevented the greater misery, the terror, the executions, the cold-blooded murders which probably would have occurred had Hitler consolidated his control of Europe and subjugated the Soviet Union. Although war and terrorism have been part of the human experience for. It addresses four components of the debate: whether new wars are ‘new’ whether new wars are war or crime whether the data supports the claims about new wars and whether new wars are ‘post-Clausewitzean’. War and terrorism are both forms of armed conflict that aim to defeat an opponent. It argues that ‘new wars’ should be understood not as an empirical category but rather as a way of elucidating the logic of contemporary war that can offer both a research strategy and a guide to policy. Abstract This article reviews the literature on ‘new wars’. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |